Hello again, readers!
To supplement the Taxonomic Chart of Medieval Research Tools and more general Academic Sources, I've added my personal reading list and goals for the summer on a new page, under the oh-so-spicy title of Reading List. I will revisit this page as my list grows, and if feeling particularly ambitious or moved, will update it with short synopses or judgments. Let me know what you think, or if you have recommendations or requests.
Til soon,
Wishing everyone some bibliographic bliss.
Sunday, July 7, 2013
Sunday, June 23, 2013
Holy Women, pt 2
Welcome back! This will conclude the "choose your own adventure" on Holy Women. Hopefully most of my posts in the future will be about my dissertation research on Anglo-Saxon prose (yes, that's as narrow as I've gotten it so far).
Moving away from holy women written by men to holy women written about themselves, I present #s 3 and 4: Julian of Norwich and Margery Kempe.
Holy Woman #3: Julian of Norwich: "the visionary"
Julian (1342-1416) was an anchorite in Norwich. As an anchorite she engaged in contemplative prayer in an institution of the church that was sanctioned, if still somewhat marginalized, by the church.
Synopsis: Hers is actually two texts: the first recounting visions over the course of a few days, the second reflecting on those visions in the context of her later life and complex doctrinal issues. She focuses on the Trinity and especially Christ but says very little about sacraments.
Themes: For those interested in the intersections of orality and literacy, I should note that she does claim to be illiterate. This could be part of a medieval modesty topos, but it nevertheless opens up conversation for what it meant to have been a "well-read"woman in medieval England (and is worth bringing up in comparison to figures like the Wife of Bath).
Her visions are beautiful, sometimes frightening, and often moving. One of her most famous showings appears in her First Revelation, when God shows her "a little thing, the quantity of a hazelnut, lying in the palm of [her] hand, as it seemed, and it was round as a ball." When she asks what it is, she hears, "It is all that is made" (I've modernized the spelling of Baker, p 9). The whole passage is tender but powerful, deftly confronting the microcosm/macrocosm in an extraordinarily intimate relationship with God.
You can find more about Julian of Norwich at Luminarium, but I highly recommend the Norton Critical edition of The Showings of Julian of Norwich by Denise Baker. You can even borrow my copy.
Holy Woman #4: Margery Kempe: "the housewife"
Margery is not a saint. Her writings are not particularly retrospective, nor even strictly autobiographical. Synopsis: Margery's Book documents her life at home and abroad; on pilgrimage and on trial. It deals with the hardships and persecutions she suffers as a woman traveling on her own and blessed with weeping spells. Unlike Julian, Margery constructs her narrative around episodic patterns rather than chronology.
Themes: Barry Windeatt writes, "[c]hronology has given way to patterns of episodes recounting loss, shame, and powerlessness, succeeded by vindication and precarious triumph, and followed in turn by renewed disempowerment and beleaguerment" (The Book of Margery Kempe, 26). But don't get the impression that she's just a victim of (admittedly, rather peculiar) circumstance; an especially memorable scene recounts her buying back her chastity from her husband. Nevertheless, Windeatt sees her story as a updated hagiography: "Here the assaults and tortures of a martyrdom have been updated into a middle-class housewife's endurance, for her convictions, of her society's contemptuous humiliation and character assassination" (19, 20). I got defensive when I first read that; it felt like an indictment of her authority, authenticity, and even her life. But those three aspects are important for us to discuss with each other and with our students. Teaching this to undergrads would be fascinating. Who would be sick of her? Who would distrust her? Who would find the whole thing fascinating, and even inspiring? Who would wonder, since it's not an instructional book, why she really had it written down? I'm not particularly fond of Margery's book, but I can identify with her person/character, and I'd love to know what you, thoughtful reader, think of her, too.
Works cited:
Baker, Denise N., ed. The Showings of Julian of Norwich. New York: W. W. Norton, 2005.
Windeatt, Barry, ed. The Book of Margery Kempe. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education, 2000.
Moving away from holy women written by men to holy women written about themselves, I present #s 3 and 4: Julian of Norwich and Margery Kempe.
Holy Woman #3: Julian of Norwich: "the visionary"
Julian (1342-1416) was an anchorite in Norwich. As an anchorite she engaged in contemplative prayer in an institution of the church that was sanctioned, if still somewhat marginalized, by the church.
Synopsis: Hers is actually two texts: the first recounting visions over the course of a few days, the second reflecting on those visions in the context of her later life and complex doctrinal issues. She focuses on the Trinity and especially Christ but says very little about sacraments.
 |
| Julian, Norwich Cathedral wikipedia.org |
Her visions are beautiful, sometimes frightening, and often moving. One of her most famous showings appears in her First Revelation, when God shows her "a little thing, the quantity of a hazelnut, lying in the palm of [her] hand, as it seemed, and it was round as a ball." When she asks what it is, she hears, "It is all that is made" (I've modernized the spelling of Baker, p 9). The whole passage is tender but powerful, deftly confronting the microcosm/macrocosm in an extraordinarily intimate relationship with God.
You can find more about Julian of Norwich at Luminarium, but I highly recommend the Norton Critical edition of The Showings of Julian of Norwich by Denise Baker. You can even borrow my copy.
Holy Woman #4: Margery Kempe: "the housewife"
Margery is not a saint. Her writings are not particularly retrospective, nor even strictly autobiographical. Synopsis: Margery's Book documents her life at home and abroad; on pilgrimage and on trial. It deals with the hardships and persecutions she suffers as a woman traveling on her own and blessed with weeping spells. Unlike Julian, Margery constructs her narrative around episodic patterns rather than chronology.
Themes: Barry Windeatt writes, "[c]hronology has given way to patterns of episodes recounting loss, shame, and powerlessness, succeeded by vindication and precarious triumph, and followed in turn by renewed disempowerment and beleaguerment" (The Book of Margery Kempe, 26). But don't get the impression that she's just a victim of (admittedly, rather peculiar) circumstance; an especially memorable scene recounts her buying back her chastity from her husband. Nevertheless, Windeatt sees her story as a updated hagiography: "Here the assaults and tortures of a martyrdom have been updated into a middle-class housewife's endurance, for her convictions, of her society's contemptuous humiliation and character assassination" (19, 20). I got defensive when I first read that; it felt like an indictment of her authority, authenticity, and even her life. But those three aspects are important for us to discuss with each other and with our students. Teaching this to undergrads would be fascinating. Who would be sick of her? Who would distrust her? Who would find the whole thing fascinating, and even inspiring? Who would wonder, since it's not an instructional book, why she really had it written down? I'm not particularly fond of Margery's book, but I can identify with her person/character, and I'd love to know what you, thoughtful reader, think of her, too.
Works cited:
Baker, Denise N., ed. The Showings of Julian of Norwich. New York: W. W. Norton, 2005.
Windeatt, Barry, ed. The Book of Margery Kempe. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education, 2000.
Tuesday, June 18, 2013
Holy Women, pt 1
Since my last post, I've passed all my PhD exams, taken a few several weeks to recover, and gone to England for a couple of weeks. After my extended break, health issues, and a family visit, I am happy to be back and researching for my dissertation prospectus.
But first, I owe you all an adventure. Three months ago you voted on which should be my next blog post, and the tallies are in: Holy Women it is! Sorry for the delay.
In order to make up for lost time, I'll do this in two installments.
Holy Woman #1: Constance in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale: "the mediator"
Chaucer's story is a bit more elaborate and stylized than its Anglo-Norman source, a chronicle by Trivet. This blend of saint's life and romance could also be called "Murderous Mothers-in-Law."
Synopsis: A syrian sultan converts to Christianity in order to marry Constance, a merchant's daughter. She's not particularly keen on the idea, but unlike the Wife of Bath admits that women "are born to thralldom and penance, and to be under man's governance." The sultan's mother resents that he converted for the pretty little thing; accordingly she fakes conversion, kills all the converts of her own land, and exiles Constance to Italy. Constance is shipwrecked in Northumbria, where she's saved by the pagan but sympathetic King Alla. After he and his people are converted by her "mediation," Alla and marries Constance and goes off to war, leaving her at the mercy HIS vengeful mother. In an intricate fake-letter plot, Constance's new mother-in-law exiles her and her son. Eventually Alla catches on, returns home, kills his mother, and takes pilgrimage to Rome.
It's been five years since Constance and her son have been lost at sea; she's never given up hope, and although she pales three times in the story, her faith and prayers sustain them. At long last they wash ashore in Rome, where the family is reunited. Alla and Constance return to England, living happily for one year before he dies. Constance leaves for Rome to live out her days with her son, now Emperor Maurice.
Themes: Constance is plotted against by older, pagan women; she accepts her fate without self-pity or despair; she leads by example, giving no grand speeches but converting others (especially powerful men) by "mediation." She is always humble, quietly accepting her fate and seeking God's protection.
Holy Woman #2: St Cecilia in Chaucer's formerly-known-as-second-nun's-tale: "the big reveal"
Influenced by Richard Love, Augustine, and the Franciscan Meditations on the Life of Christ, Chaucer's S Cecilia is sometimes thought of as "the only good woman in the Canterbury Tales." I take issue with that, but will let you make your own conclusions.
If Constance is patient and quietly brave, Cecilia is "busy" and urgently bold. We hear much more from Cecilia than we do from Custance, and I think part of that is due to genre: Man-of-Law's Tale is hagio-romance, but Cecilia's story is more strictly hagiographical. What fascinate me about Cecilia's Tale (as I mentioned in my post on Values of the Hidden in 2011) are the visible elements of the story. There are secret angels, popes popping out of catacombs, magical golden books, covert meetings, clandestine conversions, but also spectacular confrontations and tortures.
Themes: Cecilia is nothing if not active; she engages in debates on logic and faith, and has strong ties to the secretive Christian community. She preaches for three days after being boiled and half-decapitated, emphasizing her role as one who reveals the truth of God as well as the "naked"ness of her fellow humans.
That's all for now, but if you're interested in reading more (and differently) about Chaucer, check out the mind-blowing Dark Chaucer: An Assortment.
Look out for my next post on holy women later this week:
Holy Woman #3: Julian of Norwich: "the visionary"
Holy Woman # 4: Margery Kempe: "the housewife"
Chaucer's Legend of Good Women
Bokenham's Legends of Holy Women
But first, I owe you all an adventure. Three months ago you voted on which should be my next blog post, and the tallies are in: Holy Women it is! Sorry for the delay.
In order to make up for lost time, I'll do this in two installments.
Holy Woman #1: Constance in Chaucer's Man of Law's Tale: "the mediator"
 |
| From http://chaucereditions.wordpress.com/1910s/1919-highroads-to-literature/ |
Synopsis: A syrian sultan converts to Christianity in order to marry Constance, a merchant's daughter. She's not particularly keen on the idea, but unlike the Wife of Bath admits that women "are born to thralldom and penance, and to be under man's governance." The sultan's mother resents that he converted for the pretty little thing; accordingly she fakes conversion, kills all the converts of her own land, and exiles Constance to Italy. Constance is shipwrecked in Northumbria, where she's saved by the pagan but sympathetic King Alla. After he and his people are converted by her "mediation," Alla and marries Constance and goes off to war, leaving her at the mercy HIS vengeful mother. In an intricate fake-letter plot, Constance's new mother-in-law exiles her and her son. Eventually Alla catches on, returns home, kills his mother, and takes pilgrimage to Rome.
It's been five years since Constance and her son have been lost at sea; she's never given up hope, and although she pales three times in the story, her faith and prayers sustain them. At long last they wash ashore in Rome, where the family is reunited. Alla and Constance return to England, living happily for one year before he dies. Constance leaves for Rome to live out her days with her son, now Emperor Maurice.
Themes: Constance is plotted against by older, pagan women; she accepts her fate without self-pity or despair; she leads by example, giving no grand speeches but converting others (especially powerful men) by "mediation." She is always humble, quietly accepting her fate and seeking God's protection.
Holy Woman #2: St Cecilia in Chaucer's formerly-known-as-second-nun's-tale: "the big reveal"
 |
| From http://www.todayscatholicworld.com |
If Constance is patient and quietly brave, Cecilia is "busy" and urgently bold. We hear much more from Cecilia than we do from Custance, and I think part of that is due to genre: Man-of-Law's Tale is hagio-romance, but Cecilia's story is more strictly hagiographical. What fascinate me about Cecilia's Tale (as I mentioned in my post on Values of the Hidden in 2011) are the visible elements of the story. There are secret angels, popes popping out of catacombs, magical golden books, covert meetings, clandestine conversions, but also spectacular confrontations and tortures.
Themes: Cecilia is nothing if not active; she engages in debates on logic and faith, and has strong ties to the secretive Christian community. She preaches for three days after being boiled and half-decapitated, emphasizing her role as one who reveals the truth of God as well as the "naked"ness of her fellow humans.
That's all for now, but if you're interested in reading more (and differently) about Chaucer, check out the mind-blowing Dark Chaucer: An Assortment.
 |
| http://punctumbooks.com |
Look out for my next post on holy women later this week:
Holy Woman #3: Julian of Norwich: "the visionary"
Holy Woman # 4: Margery Kempe: "the housewife"
Until then, here are some other sources of medieval holy women:
The Early South English LegendaryChaucer's Legend of Good Women
Bokenham's Legends of Holy Women
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
Choose your own adventure!
Hello again, friends!
I've been taking a break from EVERYTHING since I passed written exams (booyah!), and after a kickass conference at CUNY, I'mreluctantly slowly coming back to the realities of teaching and studying for orals.
I'm drafting questions and answers as part of my prep for oral exams, and instead of writing all of them up and overloading/boring my ever-gracious readers, I thought I'd let you decide which issue is most interesting (if any). After I hear from you all on blogger, twitter, and facebook, I will write up one of the following issues for your reading leisure and pleasure (and yes, that should rhyme in your head).
1. The Alfredian canon. What's in? What's out? According to whom? [Or, "Bately and Godden got into a fight. Who won?]
NB: this refers to a group of 9th c Anglo-Saxon 'translations' of Latin originals once attributed to King Alfred.
2. Varying presentations of "holy women" in South English legendary, Chaucer, Margery Kempe, and Julian of Norwich.
3. Portrayal of chivalry in Havelok the Dane, Horn, Sir Orfeo, Chretien, Marie de France, and the last book of Malory's Morte.
So what do you think?
If none of these appeals to you, I can also write up some brief comments on:
4. How I would teach Beowulf
5. How I would teach a medieval seminar
6. How I would teach medieval/early modern drama
Please let me know (somehow), and in the meantime, don't forget to check out (and participate in) our awesome HASTAC forum on mapping.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
I've been taking a break from EVERYTHING since I passed written exams (booyah!), and after a kickass conference at CUNY, I'm
 |
| Weren't these AWESOME?! |
1. The Alfredian canon. What's in? What's out? According to whom? [Or, "Bately and Godden got into a fight. Who won?]
NB: this refers to a group of 9th c Anglo-Saxon 'translations' of Latin originals once attributed to King Alfred.
2. Varying presentations of "holy women" in South English legendary, Chaucer, Margery Kempe, and Julian of Norwich.
3. Portrayal of chivalry in Havelok the Dane, Horn, Sir Orfeo, Chretien, Marie de France, and the last book of Malory's Morte.
So what do you think?
If none of these appeals to you, I can also write up some brief comments on:
4. How I would teach Beowulf
5. How I would teach a medieval seminar
6. How I would teach medieval/early modern drama
Please let me know (somehow), and in the meantime, don't forget to check out (and participate in) our awesome HASTAC forum on mapping.
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Saturday, February 2, 2013
Moderns Interview Medievals on Arthur
Now that I've taken my major exams, I have a moment to reflect on how thankful I am to get all kinds of support from all kinds of people. One particularly surprising source of support has been Twitter, through which I'm able to be in touch with other medievalists around the world. One of the many perks of having an intellectual (if digital) community is that we can learn from each other in (almost) real-time and help one another in various stages of research.
I've reached out to fellow graduate-level-medievalist-named-Rebecca, MedievalBex, whose blog I've written about already. She was kind enough to contribute to my previous post on interviewing medieval authors about Arthur by adding in the authors of Annales Cambriae and Mabinogion.
So here's the post from last time, made better (as all things are) by collaboration.
Until soon, wishing everyone a well-networked week.
Let's imagine a time machine that, instead of taking us somewhere, just brings interesting folks into the present--that way we don't have to worry about changing, packing, etc. Brilliant!
Next, pretend that with this magic machine, I've brought some of the Arthurian authors into my home (thinking the campus coffee shop will be a little too much).
Amidst all our revery, I've asked them who they think Arthur was. Here are their answers:
Gildas (6th c): "No clue, but did you hear about the Battle of Mt Badon? It was epic, really."
Nennius (9th c): "Hmmm. Sounds a little like the dux bellorum. Helluva guy. Good leader in battles, but not much outside of that."
Annales Cambriae writer (10th c): "The Battle of Badon – Arthur carried the image of the Virgin Mary and won. Yay! The Battle of Camlann – Arthur and Medraut both fell and there was devastation in Britain. Boo."
Monmouth (12th c): "British king with awfully Welsh-looking queen and companions. A product of two great cultures."
Wace (12th c): "A king TOTALLY DISGRACED by his love-triangle. What a shame. Oh but can I just add one thing? For the sake of history? The Round Table thing...probably not real."
Marie de France (mid 12th c): "Qui est Arthur?"
Layamon (late 12th c): "King Arthur was a war-leader, a lawgiver, and a thoroughly Christian king. Also, fairies were present at his birth. That doesn't change how warry and Christiany he was, but they were there. For sure."
Stanzaic Morte author (14th c): "The king of Camelot, clearly-- he's the one with the huge military campaign in the made-up kingdom? You remember... the one who died because his best knights couldn't settle their differences? Oh and there was that terrible Modred fellow."
Chestre (mid 14th c): "Husband to that total b___ who almost ruined a really cool knight. Thankfully, said knight eventually got to live in fairy land with his magical chica. Hot."
Alliterative Morte author (late 14th c): "Arthur was a warrior king who performed in and witnessed many battles. You should have seen his armor! And his weapons, and his horse, and all his crazy moves. And do you know about his ships? Also, will this take long? I have a battle re-enactment to attend."
Mabinogion writers (14th c, or earlier): "Oh look, a magical boar! Ooh, and over there, a shapeshifter! OOOHH and a woman made of flowers!! Oh yeah, and there’s King Arthur too. But mostly magical stuff."
Malory (mid 15th c): "Arthur was an acquaintance of Sir Lancelot, the greatest knight EVER."
Oh no--someone brought up Bede and now things are getting a little heated. I'm sending these strangers home before something disastrous happens.
Wish me luck!
I've reached out to fellow graduate-level-medievalist-named-Rebecca, MedievalBex, whose blog I've written about already. She was kind enough to contribute to my previous post on interviewing medieval authors about Arthur by adding in the authors of Annales Cambriae and Mabinogion.
So here's the post from last time, made better (as all things are) by collaboration.
Until soon, wishing everyone a well-networked week.
Let's imagine a time machine that, instead of taking us somewhere, just brings interesting folks into the present--that way we don't have to worry about changing, packing, etc. Brilliant!
Next, pretend that with this magic machine, I've brought some of the Arthurian authors into my home (thinking the campus coffee shop will be a little too much).
Amidst all our revery, I've asked them who they think Arthur was. Here are their answers:
Gildas (6th c): "No clue, but did you hear about the Battle of Mt Badon? It was epic, really."
Nennius (9th c): "Hmmm. Sounds a little like the dux bellorum. Helluva guy. Good leader in battles, but not much outside of that."
Annales Cambriae writer (10th c): "The Battle of Badon – Arthur carried the image of the Virgin Mary and won. Yay! The Battle of Camlann – Arthur and Medraut both fell and there was devastation in Britain. Boo."
Monmouth (12th c): "British king with awfully Welsh-looking queen and companions. A product of two great cultures."
 |
| history.com |
Wace (12th c): "A king TOTALLY DISGRACED by his love-triangle. What a shame. Oh but can I just add one thing? For the sake of history? The Round Table thing...probably not real."
Marie de France (mid 12th c): "Qui est Arthur?"
Layamon (late 12th c): "King Arthur was a war-leader, a lawgiver, and a thoroughly Christian king. Also, fairies were present at his birth. That doesn't change how warry and Christiany he was, but they were there. For sure."
 |
| uncyclopedia.wikia.com |
Stanzaic Morte author (14th c): "The king of Camelot, clearly-- he's the one with the huge military campaign in the made-up kingdom? You remember... the one who died because his best knights couldn't settle their differences? Oh and there was that terrible Modred fellow."
Chestre (mid 14th c): "Husband to that total b___ who almost ruined a really cool knight. Thankfully, said knight eventually got to live in fairy land with his magical chica. Hot."
Alliterative Morte author (late 14th c): "Arthur was a warrior king who performed in and witnessed many battles. You should have seen his armor! And his weapons, and his horse, and all his crazy moves. And do you know about his ships? Also, will this take long? I have a battle re-enactment to attend."
Mabinogion writers (14th c, or earlier): "Oh look, a magical boar! Ooh, and over there, a shapeshifter! OOOHH and a woman made of flowers!! Oh yeah, and there’s King Arthur too. But mostly magical stuff."
Malory (mid 15th c): "Arthur was an acquaintance of Sir Lancelot, the greatest knight EVER."
 |
| William Morris, Bridgemen Art Libary |
Oh no--someone brought up Bede and now things are getting a little heated. I'm sending these strangers home before something disastrous happens.
Wish me luck!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)